Google

Bartlett's Bizarre Bazaar

Comment, Comics and the Contrary. Contact: aj_bartlett1977*at*yahoo*dot*co*dot*uk
Enter your email address below to subscribe to Bartlett's Bizarre Bazaar!


powered by Bloglet

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

 

I return

I return from my travels, fresh and ready to post, revived by visits to Hamburg, London, Amsterdam and, er, Cambridge.

Even though these trips were for just a few days each, each time I arrived home I felt that I had been away for months. None more so that when I read Blair describe his vision of a future justice system for Britain – a system of guilt by accusation – and Clarke then round on the critics of this system by accusing them of being ‘poisonous’. Had something happened while I was away, had some terrible, unprecedented crime occurred that warranted the reordering of our legal system? Granted, my wallet had been stolen, but given the geography of that event it ought, if anything, send the Dutch into reactionary spasms. Not London politicians.

So, if Blair gets his way we will have a system where those accused of criminal behaviour, but not found guilty, will have a range of legal sanctions imposed on them by the state. And it is ‘poisonous’ to describe this as authoritarian? Well, I suppose that it is a step up on ASBOs, where those accused of non-criminal behaviours have imposed on them a range of legal sanctions.

There is, of course, an element of the press that is poisonous. But it is not the Guardian, the Independent and the Observer. You might think that they are soft and misguided, but poisonous? Not when they sit alongside the Sun, which calls for a war on gypsies and accuses MPs of being ‘traitors’. Not when they sit alongside the Daily Mail and the Daily Express with their xenophobic obsessions. It is telling when a Labour minister rails not against the enemies of equality, of social justice, of intelligent, reasoned democratic discourse, but against newspapers who hold true to these values. And why? Well, the fact is that this Labour government is not left. It is not even liberal. It is at worst authoritarian and sinister. At best, it panders to the empty-headed easy populism of the right-wing tabloids. Pure poison.

Simon Jenkins has a good article in the Guardian where he challenges the Government to meet the standards they demand from the liberal media. Ahistorical hyperbolic comparisons? Inflation and misrepresentation? These are not sins of the media alone, and Clarke ought be taken to task for levelling accusations of wrongdoing by which his colleagues will also be found guilty. Poison? Well by Clarke’s measurement there are plainly poisoners in Government. Unless his ruler is one-eyed.

But at heart this seems like a childish outburst. ‘How dare you call us authoritarian!’ Clarke squeals. Well then, tell us how we should describe the position and policies of the Government on law and order, tell us just how ASBOs fit into a decent, reasonable justice system, tell us why we need ID cards, tell us why terrorism is at once both the most heinous of acts, demanding wholesale revision of the justice system, yet at the same time includes acts and activities so broad as to catch almost any extra-legal demonstration. Tell us why ministers need to power to rewrite legislation ex-democracy, tell us why those found not guilty need to be punished in a modern state.

Or, no, please do not. Clarke is a child, squealing that people are against him. And he is a bully, accusing those who call him on his authoritarianism of being ‘poisonous’. It seems that he wants to import the vicious anti-left, anti-liberal politics of the United States. Labour, throwing the country to the right. And worst of all, Clarke appears to be either a compulsive liar or a minister with no grasp of the affairs of his office. Poisonous.

Comments:
Welcome back, and I'm glad to see you're full of vim and vigour (he wrote, hastily repressing the desire to write 'piss and vinegar'!) But I am confused, yet again.

Xenophobic opinions, sometimes known as love of country or even patriotism, are described as "obsessions", and "anti-left, anti-liberal" policies are automatically "vicious". In similar vein, the Guardian, the Independent and the Observer are assumed without question to be a mainstay "of intelligent, reasoned democratic discourse", whilst the Mail, the Sun and the Express are anything but!

Well, we all enjoy a good rant from time to time but the trouble with them is that they betray a lazy, thoughtless, unsophisticated process of non-thinking re-action. Sort of thing one sees in the Sun from time to time - or so I am told on very good authority!
 
Welcome back AB. I enjoyed the post.

Not as much as enjoyed this from David though: "Xenophobic opinions, sometimes known as love of country or even patriotism...". Absolutely spot on!
 
Post a Comment

<< Home


Archives

August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   March 2007  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

«#?» Listed on Blogwise