Google

Bartlett's Bizarre Bazaar

Comment, Comics and the Contrary. Contact: aj_bartlett1977*at*yahoo*dot*co*dot*uk
Enter your email address below to subscribe to Bartlett's Bizarre Bazaar!


powered by Bloglet

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

 

Spinning De Menezes in his grave

That Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead on the tube is in itself a tragedy that demands the reappraisal of the procedures of armed policing. But this alone is not the source of my anger. Rather, it is the fact that, after de Menezes was killed, what can only be described as a pack of lies was told about him, his actions and those of the police involved. This pack of lies undermines democracy, as do all secrets and lies, and especially the secrets and lies of those in power, by inhibiting our ability to act as citizen politicians. To govern ourselves.

The shooting Jean Charles de Menezes was a crime against a person that has implications for all us. The lies that followed were crimes against us all.

Of course, the defenders of the police have been pushed into a difficult position. They can no longer defend the actions of the police, not during the shooting and certainly not after the shooting. So, rather than do this, to engage in an argument that they would surely lose, they have begun to spin the corpse of Jean Charles de Menezes.

We have, over the past few days, seen attacks on the credibility of the experienced campaigners who have joined Justice4Jean. These attacks ought to be seen as incompetent by anyone with a dash of intelligence. That they have not is a sign of how depoliticised we have been become, how we have been inculturated to see our status quo as unproblematically the natural state of affairs. How else could a Tory politician condemn the campaigners for Justice4Jean as ‘having an agenda’? Does he not have an agenda of his own? Is he some kind of political tabula rasa? Of course not, as such a state of mind could only be possessed by a person of terrible mental incapacity. Okay, he is a Tory politician, but still. Lenin’s Tomb, an ever-improving blog, has some more details on his own nasty and narrow-minded agenda. As Meaders, the author of that post writes:

“Thank heavens for Brian Coleman. The last thing any Londoner would want is for those murdered by our brave defenders of the British way of life to be represented by competent or experienced campaigners, pushing their sinister "extreme left-wing agenda" of holding the police to account.”

But the spins moves on. Now, complaining about the conduct of the police is, in itself, ‘a bad thing’, no matter what your ‘agenda’ might be. We had version one of this where the supernaturally stupid argument ran, ‘The police have made a monumental cock-up, at the very least. We accept that. But, in order to keep Britain safe, we must back these people 100%. Never mind that they are utterly incompetent, in the most generous explanation of events.’ For examples of this argument, see the defences of Ian Blair in any British paper.

Version two is much nastier. Version two involves dragging out relatives of people who were killed in the July 7th bombings to up the grief stakes. Ian Blair himself attempted to use this argument when he suggested that we should not get too upset about one death in fifty-three. He actually tried to slip this number up to fifty-seven, including the four bombers. Presumably he reasoned that the more deaths he could place on the other side of the scales from de Menezes, the more insignificant his death would seem. But now we have the relatives of the bomb victims arguing that asking for the police to be accountable undermines their ability to fight terror. Never mind that this is the way to a police state. Is anyone questioning their agenda? The agenda of the people that have put them in touch with journalists? The agenda of the journalists? You ought not get a free ticket simply as the result of personal tragedy, nor does your mind become a political tabula rasa. The concentration on the agendas of one side of this ‘argument’ (and argument that ought to be pretty straightforward; the police lied, or the police, who investigate allegations of crime to arrive at ‘truth’, are so incapable of telling truth from convenient falsehood that they ought to be sacked) betrays the agenda of a tremendous block of power.

Corrupted power, defending those who used their power to shoot an innocent man and then lie about it.

Comments:
I have to say that I found the adding of de Menezes death to the total of lives lost on 7th July an astonishing and shameful manoeuvre for which there are surely no excuses. And accountability is the most important thing to be up held in this situation, because if this is lost, we all lose our liberty.
 
To a limited extent I agree with the general thrust of your complaint, but I would point out the following.

First, until we have a definitive report it is, to put it mildly and with no pun intended, jumping the gun to accuse one party of lying.
When we get the report, then we can hammer the liars.

Second, it is not unreasonable to question the motives of those whose political views demonstrate an instinctive detestation of the police force which they consider to be the tool of a state apparatus. They are entitled to their opinion, but equally, the rest of us are entitled to hold our noses when they pretend to speak solely on behalf of the bereaved. The sound of axes being ground is deafening.

Finally, a friendly word which I know you will ignore, but I would advise caution in becoming too close to 'Lenin's Tomb'. It is an indication of its moral standards that the owner poses, proudly, under the name of one of the 20th century's infamous mass-murderers. You might consider the warped mind of anyone who started a blog entitled 'Himmler's Tomb'! Even worse, the site has now become something of a collective, with contributions from the suitably named 'bat020'; from 'Meaders', the man who supports the slogan "By All Means Necessary" in support of the Iraqi insurgents who send car bombers aginst children; and worst of all, from 'Bionic Octopus', a sort of deranged 'Rosa Kleb' whose hatred for people must be read to be believed - and you can do just that in her own words on recent exchanges on my site - but bring your own sick-bag!

Remember, Andrew, the sort of vicious hatred these people pump out will stick like shit to a blanket to anyone who gets too close.
 
Just in case you think I am exagerating the unadulterated, sick nastiness of 'Bion Octopus' (bosom friend of 'lenin'), take a look at her post this morning on the subject of a Jew knifed to death in Jerusalem. She thinks it is a huge joke!

http://bionicoctopus.blogspot.com/
 
I finally got round to checking out BiOnic Octopus, and, to tell you the truth Duff, I find most of what she has to say eminently sensible, and often insightful.

On the specific case that you mention, she has written an apology and has pulled the offending (and presumably offensive) blog post.

http://bionicoctopus.blogspot.com/2005/08/self-moderation.html

Given what you say, and now that I can only imagine the post, I have a feeling it will have been quite sick, and not a little inhumane. Gloating? I am not so sure.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home


Archives

August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   March 2007  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

«#?» Listed on Blogwise