Bartlett's Bizarre Bazaar

Comment, Comics and the Contrary. Contact: aj_bartlett1977*at*yahoo*dot*co*dot*uk
Enter your email address below to subscribe to Bartlett's Bizarre Bazaar!

powered by Bloglet

Thursday, February 24, 2005


An open letter to Charles Clarke

Andrew Bartlett
XX Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx

24th February 2005

Charles Clarke MP
The Labour Centre
59 Bethel Street

Dear Mr Clarke,

You are reported by the press as justifying the new anti-terror legislation, which includes provision for house arrest and lesser categories of ‘control orders’ by saying: “I cite only the most recent example in Europe. The Madrid atrocity took place in the Spanish general election campaign. Maybe such things can be possibilities here too. In those circumstances, it’s necessary to be able to take what steps are necessary to stop that happening.”

Citing the example of Madrid raises several important questions. Are you implying that it was the case that the Spanish authorities could have prevented the train bombings of 11th March 2004 had the ability to impose control orders been available? If so, are you implying that the Spanish authorities were wilfully lying when their early statements placed the blame on ETA? Or, if this is not the case, are you implying that control orders will be imposed on a widespread basis on the justification of the low standard of evidence and intelligence that would have allowed the Spanish authorities to ‘control’ not only the ETA suspects that were honestly, if mistakenly fingered, presumably on the basis of poor intelligence, but also the Islamist terrorists, who they claimed not to immediately suspect, but who later emerged as being responsible? If the latter is the case, how many people do you envisage ‘controlling’ in Britain? I ask because, if we are to take Madrid as our case exemplar, as you suggest, I suspect that the net of control orders would have to be cast extraordinarily wide, with significant human rights implications.

Or is it the case that you do not believe that ‘control orders’ would have prevented the Madrid bombings of 3/11/04, and that you have deployed this case as a trump card in the security debate, raising the level of public fear and winning unwarranted support for your proposals? Such a tactic does not belong in democratic debate.

Yours Sincerely,

Andrew Bartlett

I wonder if he will respond any sooner than Michael Howard. I'm still waiting for an answer to this letter.

Hey Andrew,

I totally agree with you on these control orders-an absolute disgrace designed by politicans trying to scare the living daylights out of us. To be honest I'm highly suspicious of what the Government and Police are up to; when we were fighting the IRA The Establishment went out of its way to reassure the public that it were safe and that all was being done to prevent terrorist attacks. Now we're in a situation when the Home Secretary et al are going round saying how inevitable an attack is going to be. What's more, the powers they are insisting on taking seem to use terrorism as an excuse for a powergrab, after all we fought the most tencious and well organised terrorist organisation in the world in the IRA for thirty years without destroying our ancient liberties (well for the mainland anyway). To be honest, this Government has a nasty authoritian side to it and I for one fear a Government who argues that we should be reduce to little more than serfs because of our "right to life" more than the terrorist bogey man.

Btw, Andrew can't wait to see what you've got in store for Tuesday...MOODSPINS BABY!!!!!!!!
Post a Comment

<< Home


August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   March 2007  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

«#?» Listed on Blogwise